PlatSil® 73-29 vs RTV-4130 Silicone Comparison

PlatSil® 73-29 and RTV-4130 are both Shore A30 platinum-cure silicones for reusable molds and casting applications, but their published specifications show meaningful differences in component ratio, viscosity, working time and mold turnaround. PlatSil® 73-29 uses a 1A:10B ratio by weight with a published 45-minute pour time and approximately 16-hour demold time, while RTV-4130 uses a 1:1 ratio by weight or volume with a 30–40-minute working time and approximately 4–5-hour cure time. Their mechanical data also show a different balance between tensile and tear strength and elongation.

Polytek

PlatSil® 73-29

Platinum-Cure Silicone

PlatSil® 73-29 silicone rubber
  • Hardness
    30 Shore A
  • Mix Ratio
    1A:10B
  • Viscosity
    15,000 cP

Visit Product

VS
MinghuiLink

RTV-4130

Platinum-Cure Silicone

MinghuiLink RTV-4130 silicone rubber
  • Hardness
    30 Shore A
  • Mix Ratio
    1:1
  • Viscosity
    4,400 cps

Visit Product

Conclusion

PlatSil® 73-29 and RTV-4130 are both Shore A30 platinum-cure silicones, but their published specifications show meaningful differences in component handling, mold turnaround and mechanical profile.

  • Mixing System:
    PlatSil® 73-29 uses a 1A:10B ratio by weight, while RTV-4130 uses a 1:1 ratio by weight or volume. The two systems therefore require different component-measurement and batch-preparation workflows.
  • Processing & Turnaround:
    PlatSil® 73-29 has the longer published working window at 45 minutes, while RTV-4130 is specified at 30–40 minutes. RTV-4130 has the substantially shorter published cure cycle at approximately 4–5 hours versus 16 hours.
  • Mechanical Profile:
    RTV-4130 reports higher published tensile and tear strength, while PlatSil® 73-29 reports higher published elongation. These figures should be treated as manufacturer-published reference data because test methods and conditions may differ.

1. Technical Assessment

PlatSil® 73-29 and RTV-4130 are both Shore A30 platinum-cure silicones, placing them in a medium-hardness range for reusable mold making. This hardness provides more mold body and resistance to deformation than softer A10 or A15 grades while retaining useful flexibility for demolding. Actual mold performance still depends on mold thickness, geometry and casting material.

The component ratio is one of the clearest differences between the two systems. Polytek specifies a 1A:10B ratio by weight for PlatSil® 73-29, so accurate weighing is important, particularly for smaller batches. RTV-4130 uses a 1:1 ratio by weight or volume, which simplifies component measurement and creates a different batch-preparation workflow. The two ratios should therefore be viewed primarily as a processing difference rather than as an indicator of cured performance.

Viscosity is also different in the published specifications. Polytek reports approximately 15,000 cP for mixed PlatSil® 73-29, while MinghuiLink reports approximately 4,400±200 mPa·s for Part A of RTV-4130. Because these values are reported for different material states and measurement points, they should not be treated as a strict like-for-like laboratory comparison. The published data indicate different processing characteristics, but the appropriate mixing, pouring and air-removal procedures should be evaluated according to the respective technical documentation.

The published working windows are relatively close but not identical. PlatSil® 73-29 has a 45-minute pour time, compared with a 30–40-minute working time for RTV-4130. The more significant difference is the stated demold or cure time: approximately 16 hours for PlatSil® 73-29 versus approximately 4–5 hours for RTV-4130. This difference may be important when shorter mold turnaround is required.

The published mechanical data show a different balance between elongation and resistance to loading. PlatSil® 73-29 reports 531% elongation, approximately 542 psi tensile strength and 90 pli Die B tear strength. RTV-4130 reports 400±50% elongation, 5.0±0.5 MPa tensile strength and 28±0.5 N/mm tear strength. The published figures indicate higher tensile and tear values for RTV-4130, while PlatSil® 73-29 reports higher elongation. Because the manufacturers use different test methods and data presentation, these values should be treated as published reference figures rather than a direct laboratory ranking.

PlatSil® 73-29 also offers an additional mold-making option because Polytek documents the use of PlatThix Liquid Thickener or fumed silica to increase the material’s viscosity for brush-on applications. This provides an alternative mold-construction method in addition to poured molds.

2. Technical Comparison

Technical Parameter Polytek PlatSil® 73-29 MinghuiLink RTV-4130
Silicone Type Platinum-cure silicone Platinum-cure silicone
Color White Translucent
Specific Gravity 1.10 1.06–1.08 g/cm³
Mix Ratio 1A:10B by weight 1A:1B by weight or volume
Shore Hardness 30 Shore A 30±1 Shore A
Viscosity 15,000 cP (mixed) 4,400±200 mPa·s* (Part A)
Working / Pot Life 45 min 30–40 min
Demold / Cure Time 16 hours 4–5 hours
Tensile Strength 542 psi (~3.74 MPa) 5.0±0.5 MPa
Tear Strength 90 pli (~15.8 N/mm, Die B) 28±0.5 N/mm
Elongation 531% 400±50%
Shrinkage Not publicly listed ≤0.1%
Heat Resistance Not publicly listed 250°C / 482°F
Technical Data Sources PlatSil® 73-29 RTV-4130

3. Key Differences

Key Factor Polytek PlatSil® 73-29 MinghuiLink RTV-4130 What It Means
Hardness 30 Shore A 30±1 Shore A Both target the same general A30 mold range, providing a balance between support and flexibility.
Mixing System 1A:10B by weight 1A:1B by weight or volume RTV-4130 uses a simpler 1:1 component-measurement workflow, while PlatSil® 73-29 requires accurate weighing of the 1:10 ratio.
Published Viscosity 15,000 cP (mixed) 4,400±200 mPa·s (Part A) The published values differ, but the measurement points and material states are not identical.
Working Window 45 min pour time 30–40 min working time PlatSil® 73-29 has the longer published working window.
Turnaround 16 hours demold 4–5 hours cure RTV-4130 has the substantially shorter published demold or cure time under the respective stated conditions.
Mechanical Profile 542 psi tensile; 90 pli Die B tear; 531% elongation 5.0±0.5 MPa tensile; 28±0.5 N/mm tear; 400±50% elongation RTV-4130 reports higher published tensile and tear strength, while PlatSil® 73-29 reports higher elongation.
Brush-On Adaptation Can be thickened with PlatThix or fumed silica Not specifically listed PlatSil® 73-29 can be adapted for brush-on mold construction as well as poured molds.

4. Application Comparison

Application PlatSil® 73-29 RTV-4130 Key Consideration
Resin Casting Molds Suitable Suitable Both can be used for reusable resin molds. Consider working time, tear strength, elongation and repeated demolding.
Prototype Molds Suitable Suitable PlatSil® 73-29 provides a longer published working window, while RTV-4130 offers a shorter published cure cycle.
Brush-On Mold Making Suitable with thickener Not specifically listed PlatSil® 73-29 can be thickened with PlatThix Liquid Thickener or fumed silica for brush-on applications.
3D-Printed Masters Suitable with compatibility testing Suitable with compatibility testing UV-resin residue, sulfur-containing materials, amines, tin compounds and some coatings can inhibit platinum-cure silicone. A small compatibility test is recommended before full-scale molding.
Deep-Undercut Molds Suitable with design considerations Suitable with design considerations A30 provides more mold body than softer A10 or A15 grades. Actual demolding depends on undercut depth, mold thickness and part geometry.

5. FAQ

Compare Another Silicone

Need Help Choosing?

Tell us your application. We’ll recommend the right RTV-2 silicone and provide a sample for testing.

Request a Sample